'In the relationship of agricultural producers with the state, took Nation frequently the first defense against what he considered the excessive "fiscal voracity" of the second. Excess tax according to the paper applied to the agricultural sector stemmed from the need to meet the growth in government spending. He claimed that both the national and provincial, which is voted levies substantial costs fell on farmers and ranchers, making the government "a voracious plague, more terrible than the drought and locusts, which has become a parasite fiscal styling mercilessly the bowels of the economy, living at the expense of production and consumption depleted "(editorial Nation, May 24, 1911). These practices had been favored, according to the newspaper, by the total lack of mechanisms of democratic control over state management. " I started reading
policy view from above of Sidicaro, by a paper by the faculty. This paragraph, on pages 37-38, I was very funny. In 1911, President Roque Sáenz Peña was, there was no universal suffrage, Peronism did not exist. And yet, the position of Nation today is the same, and the fragment quoted Sidicaro not be misplaced on the editorial page of the tribune of doctrine.
0 comments:
Post a Comment